Toyota C-HR I or Lynk & Co 01: which has fewer APK problems?

At 3–4 years (mostly built 2021–2023) 0.4% of inspected Toyota C-HR Is had at least one A-problem, against 0.7% for the Lynk & Co 01 and 1.3% nationally. The difference is small: the confidence intervals overlap, so at this age they are close. Over all ages together the Toyota C-HR I has an A-problem 72% less often than average, the Lynk & Co 01 46% less often.

Window: Oct 2025 – Sep 2026 · Updated: 16 Oct 2026

At this age the C-HR has fewer A-problems.

Also check the weak spots and the history of the specific car.

ModelModel years

Toyota C-HR I

2016 – 2024

Illustration Toyota C-HR I

Lynk & Co 01

2021 – 2026

Illustration Lynk & Co 01
AA-problemsDefects at the APK

0.4%

n = 3,822 · 95% CI 0.2 – 0.6%

0.7%

n = 12,129 · 95% CI 0.6 – 0.9%

All defectsAll kinds of APK defects

20.4%

n = 3,822 · 95% CI 19.1 – 21.7%

20.0%

n = 12,129 · 95% CI 19.3 – 20.7%

Three points to checkMost common defects at the APK
  1. 1Brakes
  1. 1Brakes
  2. 2Seat belts, seats and airbags
Next stepSee the details or open the checklist.
View model Open checklist
View model Open checklist

A-problems side by side

Percentages with 95% confidence intervals.

02468101214161820 A-problems (%) National: 1.3% · n = 512,830 · 95% CI 1.3 – 1.3% Toyota C-HR I2016 – 2024 0.4% (n = 3,822 · 95% CI 0.2 – 0.6%) Lynk & Co 012021 – 2026 0.7% (n = 12,129 · 95% CI 0.6 – 0.9%)

Choose another age or add a third model

More comparisons

Source: RDW Open Data (CC0), analysis CarXray.nl. 6,857,004 inspected passenger cars aged 3 years and older, Oct 2025 – Sep 2026. Each car counts once. How we know